Thursday, March 21, 2019
Free Euthanasia Essays: Oregon, Assisted Suicide and Right to Life :: Free Euthanasia Essay
Oregon, Assisted Suicide and mightily to sprightliness   The reader of this root will learn how the Right to Life movement is getting pertain in a dramatic way in the support self-destruction battle in the state of Oregon. The NRLC( content Right to Life Committee), as rise up as the state RTL group, is participating in the court battle resulting from Oregons November, 2001 legal challenge to Ashcrofts decision -- initiated to keep assisted suicide practices functioning smoothly in Oregon.   The National Right to Life Committee and Oregon Right to Life filed a friend of the court brief in the crusade challenging the recent decision of U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft that the Controlled Substances issue does non permit the enjoyment of federally controlled drugs for assisted suicide. Under the Ashcroft decision, physicians who impose controlled drugs for assisted suicide could lose their licenses to prescribe any federally controlled drugs, which would effica ciously end the medical practice of many doctors. The brief supports the position of the coupled States, arguing that the Ashcroft decision should be upheld. (Oregon)   In November of 2001, the State of Oregon brought crusade against the Ashcroft ruling charging that it effectively nullifies Oregons law permitting physician-assisted suicide for the terminally ill. Oregon is the scarcely state to have legalized physician-assisted suicide. Oregon was joined in the suit, Oregon v. Ashcroft, by a number of persons seeking assisted suicide, a physician, a pharmacist, and an assisted suicide advocacy organization. Federal district court judge Robert E. Jones in Portland, Oregon, enjoined enforcement of the Ashcroft ruling pending prompt resolution of the case in his court. The National and Oregon Right to Life brief argues that Ashcrofts decision was fully confirm because the federal government can choose to harbor all world life through its laws even if the State of Oregon has chosen not to do so. Just because Oregon allows its doctors to prescribe lethal drug overdoses to patients doesnt mean(a) that the federal government has to agree that this is a legitimate medical use of the drugs, said James Bopp, Jr., General Counsel of the National Right to Life Committee. The Oregon tail doesnt wag the federal dog. The U.S. government can protect all human lives even if Oregon turns its back on few of them.   The brief also argues that the Ashcroft decision avoids constitutional problems by refusing to discriminate against terminally ill persons in enforcement of federal drug laws.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.