How far is it acceptable for technology to be used only for financial benefits Essay

?The inexorable development of engineering science has indeed deform an integral part of our lives. Evidently, we often involve engineering science al near in any aspect of our lives. As a result, business in engine room ara seems very enticing for most bulk as they screw potentially generate a lot of receipts from this field. Hence, more than and more people first gear to invest in it. However, as people argon getting indulged in profit maximisation, problems bear uponing ethics and social welfargon start to arise from applied science.Some argue that the impost of technology solo for financial benefit is acceptable because much(prenominal) benefit can be redistribute to the less privileged ones to improve their welfare. However, others claim that it is unacceptable to do so because people, more often than not, may pursue such benefit at the expense of others. I, personally, am more inclined to the latter stand as the sole usage of technology for financial benefit w ill believe a fatal blow to the global partnership.It is acceptable to use technology for financial benefit only because it can indirectly contribute to the societal welfare. This is because some of the profit gained from the selling of such technology is used to cooperate those in need. Hence, money earned is, in a way, redistributed to the short(p) to boost their welfare. A case in a point is the gate Foundation in which Bill Gates, the founder of Microsoft, channels some of his profit from his business in the computer field to build this foundation to clear the needy to lead a better life.his is obviously unacceptable because every person has the right to have fair wages and enjoy causative working environment. Thus, the use of technology only for financial benefit is dummy up unacceptable, regardless of such benefit that may be used to jock the last and the least, if some groups are being made worse shoot in the process. Furthermore, focusing only on financial benefit w hen we undertake technology will make technological development shifts towards the favour of plentiful people only.Rich and poor people certainly have unalike kind of needs while the rich aims, mostly, for self-enhancement, the poor are in time struggling to survive. Hence, since the richs demand seems to be more stipendiary for many investors because self-enhancement, like plastic surgery, is indubitably extornionate and, hence, generates a lot of profit, they will just invest their money for technological development in this area. As a result, morerudimentary aspects of technology, such as the mass outturn of food using food technology, are neglected. The poor will whence suffer nevertheless to a greater extent than before. Another concern from this shift is that the widening of chasm between the rich and the poor will be more pervasive. Such result entails even worse implications in our order of magnitude as social unrest may occur. Hence, given the dire consequences of the prostitute of technology, utilisation of it for financial benefit solely is unacceptable.Finally, the sole use of technology for financial benefit may corrupt our intrinsic values and virtues as human beings. Paradigm shift on our attitudes towards technology -more accepting and hooklike has made commodification of technology more successful. Thus, more and more people are focusing in this area and if their only goal for the use of technology is on monetary reward, they will do anything to its commercialisation to be even more successful. This includes the addition of elements in the technology itself to allure more people to use it.Unfortunately, those elements sometimes blemish our values as responsible humans. A case in a point would be the advent of bowelless video games (gaming technology) that distort the values of people, especially the teenagers and children. If they are exposed by the wrong principles throughout their stages of life, they will, most likely, not grow to people whom the society wants them to be. Hence, since the use of technology only for financial benefit results in such a case, I believe that it is unacceptable.In conclusion, it is unacceptable if technology is only used for financial benefit because others aspects concerning global welfare are most likely to be neglected. Therefore, a holistic approach should be follow in harnessing the technology, so that multifarious fields in human lives are benefited. Hence, technology is a social product encapsulates the essence in the usage of technology as it should act as a representation of the thorough needs of our society.